A bizarre row has erupted over whose job it is to clean the filthy old public toilets outside Sainsbury’s in Stamford Hill.
Rainwater has completely flooded the stairs and turned the area into a swamp, with trees growing out of the ladies’ and the steps to the gents’ thick with duckweed.
But Hackney Council and the unnamed owner of the loos are both refusing to carry the can and have washed their hands of the problem – because no one can decide who owns the stairs. The Gazette understands the owner is saying the steps down to the facilities weren’t included in the land registry title. But the council believes both the toilets and stairs were always meant to be publicly owned and were only sold to the landowner in error.
The bickering means the serious questions over health and safety surrounding the site are going unanswered and regular passer-by Michelle Blue is furious nothing is being done.
She told the Gazette: “A few years ago I noticed there was lots of water in there. I looked again earlier this year and there were trees growing out of it. There’s about 10 feet of stagnated water – it’s a swamp.”
Michelle contacted environmental health but got nowhere, so she emailed mayor Phil Glanville. In his response, seen by the Gazette, he revealed the details of the unusual dispute.
He said: “I can confirm that ownership of these toilets is held by the adjoining landowner and is presently included within the title which also incorporates the Sainsbury’s store.
“Unfortunately, however, I am advised the registered owner does not have access to the toilets as the steps down to them are not included within their ownership; the owner has therefore argued they are unable to maintain them.”
The mayor said discussions were taking place with the land registry to decide who actually owns the toilets (and stairs).
Bosses at the town hall believe ownership should be given to the council, and if that happens the toilets will be cleaned and let out.
A council spokeswoman told the Gazette: “The disused public toilet on Stamford Hill is not owned by the council. The council is currently in contact with the owner to discuss options for the future use of the property.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here